Prolonged waiting times in Australian Emergency Departments (EDs) are back in the headlines this week, and represent a complex, multifaceted challenge with significant implications for patient outcomes, staff morale, and overall healthcare system efficiency. We provide a step-by-step framework for identifying bottlenecks and implementing targeted solutions.
Step 1 – Collect the relevant data
Patient Flow Metrics
Collect granular data on ED presentation times, triage categories, time to first assessment, time to treatment initiation, length of stay in the ED, and discharge/admission times. Analyse these metrics across different times of the day, days of the week, and periods of the year to identify trends and peak demand periods.
Patient Demographics
Gather data on patient age, presenting complaints, referral types (e.g. ambulance, primary care), comorbidities, geographic location, and socio-economic factors. This may reveal specific population groups that disproportionately contribute to ED congestion.
Resource Utilisation
Track the availability and utilisation of key resources,
including bed occupancy, staffing levels (medical, nursing, allied health), administrative staff, diagnostic imaging availability, pathology capacity, and access to specialist consults. Identify periods of resource scarcity that might be contributing to bottlenecking.
Process Mapping
Conduct a detailed process map of the entire patient journey within the ED, from arrival to discharge. Identify critical decision points, handovers, and potential areas for delay.
Staff Surveys and Interviews
Gather qualitative data from ED staff in ‘admitting teams’ through surveys and interviews. Understand their perceptions of the challenges, identify potential process improvements, and address staff morale and well-being. This vital data often uncovers issues that data alone cannot.
Step 2 – Analyse the data to identify bottlenecks
Bottleneck Analysis
Pinpoint specific stages of the patient journey that contribute most significantly to delays. These may include triage, initial assessment, diagnostic testing, accessing specialist review, or waiting for an inpatient bed to become available.
Root Cause Analysis
Conduct a thorough root cause analysis (e.g., 5 Whys, Fishbone diagram) to delve deeper into the underlying reasons for the identified bottlenecks. Don’t just treat the symptoms, understand the causes.
Benchmarking
Compare performance against relevant local, national and international benchmarks. This will highlight areas that are significantly underperforming and should be prioritised.
Data Visualisation
Present complex data in easily digestible visual formats (e.g., dashboards, process maps) to facilitate communication and understanding amongst all stakeholders. Based on the data analysis and insights, develop targeted interventions to identified bottlenecks.
Step 4 – Optimise Triage and Initial Assessment
Advanced Triage Protocols
Implement or refine triage protocols to ensure patients are rapidly and accurately categorised according to urgency. Implement streamlined triage protocols incorporating advanced risk stratification tools to quickly identify high-acuity patients, ensuring immediate access to necessary resources. Consider the use of nurse-doctor team triage models or doctor-led triage.
Nurse-Initiated Protocols
Empower experienced ED nurses to initiate investigations and treatment for specific conditions based on pre-defined protocols.
Rapid Assessment Zones
Create dedicated areas for rapidly assessing and treating low-acuity patients, freeing up resources for more critical cases.
Virtual Triage
Explore telehealth, “virtual ED” models and remote triage options to streamline assessment, particularly in non-metropolitan areas. Consider co-locating GPs within the emergency department.
Step 5 – Simplify Diagnostic Processes
Point-of-Care Testing
Implement point-of-care testing technologies to reduce turnaround times for critical lab results.
Streamline Imaging Processes
Optimise scheduling and access to diagnostic imaging to minimise wait times.
Step 6 – Enhance treatment pathways
Direct Access to Specialists
Establish clear protocols for direct access to specialist consultations, avoiding delays associated with internal referrals.
Standardise Treatment Protocols
Develop and implement standardised treatment pathways for common ED presentations to reduce variability and improve efficiency.
Step 7 – Improve Patient Flow and Bed Management
Patient Flow Optimisation
Focus on efficient patient movement through the ED utilising strategies like “pull” systems, including designated patient pathways for specific conditions.
Develop strategies to expedite discharge processes, such as early discharge planning and clear information for patients and families.
Hospital-Wide Bed Management Systems
Collaborate with inpatient units to implement a hospital-wide bed management system that facilitates more efficient flow of patients out of the ED. Consider measuring the performance of bed management processes: e.g., throughput per bed, waiting time for beds, and occupancy level.
Alternative Care Pathways
Implement alternative care pathways, such as observation units, ambulatory care clinics, hospital in the home, and short-stay units to divert admissions where appropriate.
Community Partnerships
Strengthen partnerships with community-based healthcare providers to ensure appropriate care for patients discharged from the ED. A focus on aged care and residential facilities is particularly important.
Step 8 – Review Staffing and Resource Allocation
Staffing Ratios
Review and optimise staffing levels based on patient volumes and acuity, ensuring appropriate skill mix.
Cross-Training
Enhance staff skills through cross-training programs to ensure staff can handle a variety of roles during peak periods. Consider role substitution and ensure all staff are working at the top of their respective scopes.
Advanced Practitioner Roles
Consider the expanded roles of advanced practice nurses and physician assistants to optimise care delivery.
Dynamic Resource Allocation
Use resource allocation models to predict and respond to fluctuations in demand in real-time. Consider “floating beds, floating nurses or floating physicians” models in which individual speciality departments only have the minimum of ‘fixed’ staffing and resources, and the rest are shared among the different departments in a flexible way as required.
Employ effective staffing models matching resource allocation to peak demand periods and staff skill mix. This includes flexible scheduling and a focus on multidisciplinary collaboration.
Step 9 – Monitor Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
Regular Data Review
Establish a system for regularly reviewing key performance indicators (KPIs) related to ED waiting times and patient flow. (e.g. average ED length of stay, time to triage, time to doctor assessment).
Data Reporting
Develop regular reporting mechanisms to share performance data with all relevant stakeholders.
Alerting System
Implement an alerting system to detect deterioration in performance and allow for timely intervention.
Step 10 – Evaluate solutions and share Best-Practice
Pre- and Post-Intervention Analysis
Compare pre- and post-intervention data to assess the impact of implemented strategies.
Qualitative Evaluation
Gather qualitative feedback from staff and patients to understand their experiences with the implemented changes.
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of implemented interventions to ensure sustainable resource allocation.
Best Practice Sharing
Collaborate with other healthcare organisations to share best practices and learn from successful interventions.
Conclusion
Reducing waiting times in Australian Emergency Departments is a complex process that requires a strategic, data-driven approach. By systematically assessing the situation, implementing targeted interventions, and continuously monitoring and evaluating performance, healthcare leaders are better equipped to create a more efficient and patient-centred emergency care system. This multi-faceted solution requires leadership, collaboration, and a commitment to evidence-based practice. This guide provides a framework, but successful implementation requires a nuanced approach tailored to local conditions and unique challenges. A collaborative, flexible and data-driven mindset is key to success.
Follow AIHE for access to curated expert analysis and industry insights, to stay ahead of the curve in healthcare leadership.
References:
- Elalouf, A., Wachtel, G. Queueing Problems in Emergency Departments: A Review of Practical Approaches and Research Methodologies. Oper. Res. Forum 3, 2 (2022).